Every trading day moves the shelf a little further from the plan.

Not all at once. One facing, one delivery, one busy shift at a time.

One bay, three weeks after a reset Day 0 · reset complete
    • Priority line
    • Fast seller
    • New serum
    • Promotion

    Four ordinary days

    Each for a good reason. Each hidden by a tidy bay.

    Eye levelBottom

    The product that moved down

    A delivery needs space, so the priority line drops to the bottom shelf. The bay still looks full.

    Eye levelFast seller: 3 facingsFast seller: 1 facing

    The facing that disappeared

    A neighbour spreads into the gap. The best seller comes back to less space, and runs out again.

    Eye levelNEWNew serum: in frontNew serum: behind the range

    The launch nobody encountered

    The launch waits behind the range. Weak early sales then cut its support.

    PROMOTIONOFFERStill inthe leaflet

    The promotion that became storage

    Overflow cartons fill the end-cap while the leaflet still advertises the offer.

    A correct reset doesn’t stay correct

    Every usual check sees part of the picture. None sees the shelf between visits.

    Manual audits
    See one moment, not the weeks between.
    Sales data
    Can’t tell a moved product from an unwanted one.
    Vendor reps
    See their own portfolio, not the whole bay.
    Store managers
    Have the whole store to run.

    Between inspections

    The five changes from the bay above. Choose how often someone looks.

    In pharmacy and beauty, a near miss matters

    Suitability
    The pack next door is not always an acceptable swap.
    Launches
    A launch out of sight is judged on sales it couldn’t make.
    Category balance
    It erodes one substitution at a time, while the shelf looks full.
    Not a compliance claim
    Plan adherence is a merchandising measure, never regulatory evidence.

    A current view of the shelf

    You need a mirror, not another audit: a current view of the shelf your shopper sees, and which differences matter.

    See your shelf gap

    Fair questions

    We already do manual audits. Isn’t that enough?

    Audits are useful for checking standards and correcting problems. The question is what happens between visits. Judge your coverage against how quickly shelves change and how long commercially important errors remain undetected. Audits and a current view of the shelf answer different questions; many teams need both.

    Wouldn’t our POS data tell us if something was wrong?

    It can flag unusual sales patterns. It cannot directly show that a product moved shelves or lost its facings. Physical context helps distinguish weak demand from weak execution. Read together, sales data and shelf evidence tell you more than either alone.

    Our managers adapt the layout to local demand. Is that a problem?

    Local adaptation can improve the plan. Record it as an approved exception so intentional choices remain distinguishable from accidental drift. An exception that works locally may be worth adopting in the plan itself.

    If shoppers buy another brand, haven’t we kept the sale?

    Often you have. That is why the model does not count every execution error as lost revenue. Substitution may preserve the sale, change its margin, or fail to meet the shopper’s particular need. In the model, severity is the share of exposed sales that is actually lost.

    How do you know the new product isn’t simply a poor seller?

    You do not know from low sales alone. Check availability and placement alongside price, demand, and repeat purchase. Correct execution makes the sales result more interpretable; it does not guarantee success.